Last Modified: November 14, 2000.
Macro photography is used to describe the art of taking photos of small things. Many camera manufacturers sell so-called "macro lenses" that are specially designed to do this well. Nikon, of course, wants to be different, and calls them "micro lenses", but a Nikon "micro" is designed with the same purposes as any other manufacturer's "macro" lenses. Here is an overview of macro lenses. A more complete description appears later on this page.
There are lots of ways to go about getting magnification with a camera,
and I'll talk about many of them here. The topics below are arranged
roughly in order of difficulty. In addition, there are two
"theoretical" sections at the beginning that I highly recommend, as the
later sections on technique will make a lot more sense if you understand
Thus, the best way to determine how good a close-up you've taken is to measure the actual object you've taken a photo of, and measure how big that object is on the negative or slide. If they are exactly the same size, we say that the magnification is 1:1 (read this as "one to one"). In other words, the image on the negative is exactly as big as the object itself was.
For 35mm film, this means that an object that's 36mm long (about an inch and a half) would completely fill a negative or slide in the widest direction.
If you don't do quite that well, and your image on the slide is only half as big as the original object, the magnification is 1:2. If you do exceptionally well, and the image on the slide is twice as big as the original object, you got 2:1 magnification. 1:1 magnification (also called "life-sized") is pretty good. Anything with magnification of about 1:2 or more is often called macro photography.
Tom's "Fundamental Theorem of Optics for Photography" is this: If you stack up any combination of lenses with any distances between them, as long as they're lined up center to center, the whole combination will behave exactly like a single lens.
So if you take a lens and mount it further from the camera, or if you reverse it somehow, or if you take two lenses and put one in front of the other, or whatever, the resulting combination will behave like a single lens.
This is exactly true in the so-called "thin lens approximation", which applies to "infinitely thin" lenses. Your lenses are not. So that means that there will be some distortion, depending on what you do, and so the more lenses you stack up, or the further they are from their optimal design configurations, the more distortion you're going to get.
But go ahead and stack them any way you like -- with an SLR you can look through the viewfinder and see if you can even focus the mess, and you can often see the sorts of distortion you're likely to get. For combinations that seem to work well, take a few sample photos and see what the quality is like.
In addition to my "theorem" above, the other main idea to understand about optics is this. A lens will only focus perfectly on your film for objects in one plane parallel to the plane of the lens. The further the lens is from the film, the closer that plane of perfect focus will be the front of the lens.
In other words, what normally happens when you focus a lens is that you move the lens toward or away from the film. The further the lens is from the film, the closer objects will have to be to the lens to be in perfect focus, and vice-versa. (Note: there are some so-called "internal-focus" lenses where it's not at all obvious what's happening as you turn the focus ring -- the lens appears not to change size or shape at all, and what's happening is that the little lens elements inside the lens are being moved around relative to each other to change the effective distance of the lens from the film.)
But if you take any lens and don't change the focus setting on it, and mount in front of an extension tube, the result will focus closer because the optical center of the lens has been moved away from the film by the length of the extension.
One nice way to think about it is this. Imagine a point in space that you would like to focus on. This is just a single very tiny point. Light from the sun (or your flash) scatters from this point in all directions, leaving, and that light hits your camera's lens. The lens intercepts a circular chunk of the light and bends it back into a cone whose base is at the lens. If the exact tip of that cone is on your film, then all of the light from the tiny object will be focused on that one point on the film, so the object will be in perfect focus.
But now imagine that it isn't quite in focus; in other words, the film is slightly too close or slightly too far from the lens. Then the incoming light will smear to a small circle which is the size of the tip of the cone that the film cuts through. Although all the light from the subject comes from a point, it will be smeared to a small circle on the film. This is the blur of a blurred (out of focus) image.
The more error there is in film position, the larger will be the circle (the blur). You can change the focus by twisting the focus ring on the lens (or your camera will do this for you if it's an auto-focus camera), and what this effectively does is move the lens closer to or further from the film.
Unfortunately, objects at different places in space will focus at different distances from the lens, so wherever you put the film, some of your subjects will be too close, and some too far away (unless, of course you are taking photos of perfectly flat objects).
So all you can do is to pick one object that you want in focus, you can then focus on that, and everything closer and further away will be out of focus.
Now obviously, if you're very close to being in focus, the error will not be too bad, and since you're just a human, your eyesight isn't perfect anyway, so there will be a small range around the point of perfect focus where the error is so small that the image is "good enough". This distance is called the "depth of field".
So maybe if the object at perfect focus is 8 feet from the lens, everything from 7 feet 6 inches to 9 feet from the lens is in "good enough" focus. In this case, the depth of field is 1.5 feet.
Unfortunately, as things get close to the lens (even with the best possible lenses), the depth of field gets smaller and smaller. This is the main problem faced by macro photographers. Their depth of field may be only a half of a millimeter.
So what can you do? The easiest thing is to reduce your aperture. This means that you effectively make the circle of light cut out by your lens smaller, so the cone is much skinnier. With a skinnier cone, an error forward and back makes a smaller error circle (this is usually called the "circle of confusion"). So the smaller the aperture (in other words, the larger the f/number), the more depth of field you will get.
But if the aperture is smaller, less light gets in and you need longer exposes. You just can't win!
But you can do things. For example, if your subject isn't moving, put your camera on a tripod and take a long exposure. If it is moving, use a huge flash so that even with a tiny aperture enough light gets in for a proper exposure. Or better, use a combination --- a tripod plus a flash.
When you shoot macro, it's not unusual to shoot at f/22, f/32, or even f/45. There are, however, physical limits caused by diffraction. When light travels through a small enough hole, there are edge effects that also scatter the light. Once the opening is effectively f/45 or so (and the exact number depends on the focal length), the tiny aperture itself causes blurring due to light diffraction.
On most lenses, you can read off the depth of field which will be a function of how close to the lens you are focused, and on your aperture. Some cameras also have a "depth of field preview" button that you can press to see exactly what will be in focus when you shoot the shot. (Normally, while you are composing, et cetera, the lens is wide-open to let in as much light as possible. Then, when you trip the shutter, the lens closes down to your selected aperture, the shutter opens, and the film is exposed.)
My theorem above ignores all the ugliness of real lenses, and assumes that every lens is a perfect thin lens. In the real world, there are many distortions that may get very bad if the lens is used far outside the range where it was designed.
Macro lenses are designed to work in close-up situations. The price you pay usually has two forms. One is the actual price of the lens -- macro lenses can be quite a bit more expensive. The other price is that macro lenses typically have a smaller maximum aperture than you can get with a standard lens. For example, Nikon's 60mm macro lens is only f/2.8. It's not hard to get a f/1.4 55mm standard lens, which will let in four times as much light when it's wide-open. Actually, there's also a third price you pay: macro lenses are often physically bigger and heavier.
In spite of the disadvantages above, I often put on my 60mm f/2.8 macro as a standard lens when I'm just taking a camera along with no particular purpose in mind. It is a bit heavier, and I may have trouble in dim light, but if I see a really interesting little insect or flower, I'm in business.
One thing to beware of is that many (not all) of the zoom lenses are advertised as working in the macro range, and this usually means that they can work a little outside the normal range for such lenses, but they don't work anywhere near as well as a macro lens designed specifically for that purpose. On the lens barrel of such lenses, there's often a colored stripe at the close-focus end, marked "Macro". Before buying one of these and thinking that you've got a real macro lens, compare it to a standard, fixed-focal length macro lens. (Hint: a real macro lens will not have "Macro" printed on a portion of the focus ring.)
There are other things that a macro lens may be optimized for. One type of lens is called "flat field", and this means that it is in focus on a planar area. If you want to take pictures of flat things, like pages of a book, or other photos, or coins, or paintings, you'll want a flat field lens. Other lenses are exactly in focus on a curved surface in space. Since the vast majority of photographic subjects aren't flat, it doesn't matter much whether most lenses are flat-field -- you'll just look through the viewfinder and make the best possible tradeoff. But if you're shooting a printed page, it's a real bummer to have the words in the center readable while those at the edges are not.
It's a bit tricky to calculate exposures, especially for highly-magnified scenes, and in the old days I simply bracketed all my shots. ("Bracketing" means that you make a guess as to the correct exposure, and then under- and over-expose around your guess. For example, if you think the shot should take 1/8 second at f/16, you simply shoot at 1/4, 1/8, and 1/16 seconds. Or if you're even more paranoid, at 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, and 1/32 seconds. This example is bracketing by full stops -- you can bracket at 1/2 stops or even 1/3 stops on some cameras. You can also bracket the f-stop setting if you want to preserve the shutter speed.)
But now, thanks to the wonder of TTL metering, macro exposure is much easier if you've got an electronic flash. "TTL" stands for "Through the lens", and here's how it works. When you press the shutter release and the shutter is fully open, the flash goes off. Light travels from the flash to the subject, and some of that is reflected back to the film. The camera has a detector inside it that measures the amount of light arriving at the film, and the moment that enough light has arrived for a proper exposure, the flash is "quenched" (turned off).
Now there are obviously a couple of possible problems with this scheme.
First of all, what if the flash uses all of its energy and there's still not enough light for a proper exposure? Well, in that case, you're out of luck and you'll get an under-exposed photo.
Second, what if the shutter is open for a long time, and it's really bright out? As an example, imagine that you're shooting at 1/8 of a second. The flash will quench after, say, 1/1000 of a second, but the shutter will remain open for the remainder of the 1/8 of a second, and you'll almost certainly over-expose.
Here's how I get pretty good macro shots almost every time. You've got to be willing to waste a little film, but with a little practice, you can reduce this to almost nothing.
Set your camera in full manual mode. Then set the shutter speed to the highest speed that's possible for "flash-sync". Often this speed will be marked in a different color on your shutter-speed adjustment, but if not, look it up in your owner's manual. On high-quality cameras, it will probably be 1/250 second. On lower-quality modern cameras, it may be 1/125 second. On old cameras, it may be as low as 1/60 second.
Next, given your subject, make a guess at how small an aperture you can get away with. If you're close to the subject, this may be as small as f/32, but it may be larger. Set the aperture to this best guess.
Now take a shot with the flash in TTL mode (see your owner's guide to figure out how to do this. For most modern flashes, it's the default.) If there's not enough power to get a proper exposure, most flashes will so indicate by a flashing indicator light or something. If this happens, it means that you guessed wrong about the minimum aperture -- open up a bit and shoot again. If the light doesn't blink, then maybe you should try an even smaller aperture. Stop it down a notch and try again.
Here's the theory. You want the fastest shutter speed so that ambient light doesn't have any effect on the shot -- or at least has as small an effect as possible. You want as small an aperture as you can that still allows in enough light for a complete exposure because that will give you more depth of field, and depth of field is going to be your largest problem for macro shots. By diddling the aperture until you're shooting so that the flash can just barely make it, you'll get the most depth of field. Since the entire flash takes probably less than 1/1000 second, with a tiny aperture you're effectively shooting at 1/1000 second.
Things can be made much better using a flash extension cord. Normally, the flash is mounted directly on the camera body, and although this is great for shots of people, if you're trying to shoot something that's 1/2 inch from the lens, the vast majority of the light from the flash will go over the top of your subject. A flash extension cord lets you move the flash anywhere you want (within a couple of feet, at least). You can hold the flash right next to the lens. Try shots with the flash close, but off to the side, or various other things. If you've got a friend, have him/her hold the flash while you manage the camera. Some systems allow you to synchronize multiple flashes, so you can eliminate shadows (and have a lot more light).
In the old days (and of course with older systems), you have to do a calculation of the amount of light arriving at your subject based on the power of the flash and the distance to the subject. This calculation, of course, relied on having the flash pointed directly at the subject. If the flash is coming in at an angle, or is bounced off a reflector first, or is being scattered by some sort of light "softening" plastic the calculation had to be adjusted in some way that was often impossible to compute. So when this was the situation, you'd either bracket your shots, or run a test flash with an incident light meter at the subject.
But with TTL, this is all unnecessary -- the flashes continue to put out light until exactly enough has arrived for a proper exposure, then they magically turn off.
TTL, of course, works also in non-macro photography, but it is especially useful for close-ups.
These macro flashes are more expensive and less powerful than a standard flash, but for some macro work, they're just the thing.
In most modern TTL systems, you can use multiple flashes together, as long as you have the appropriate cables, so that when you trip the shutter, all the flashes go off, and when the correct amount of light reaches the film, all of them are automatically turned off at the same time. There are even devices that you can buy that sense the light of flashes and instruct the flash connected to them to go while the others are flashing, so you can have remote TTL light sources. This isn't quite so important for macro, but they can be used. The ring flashes can be used in combination with additional flashes (at least on the Nikon system) to extend the amount of flash available in TTL mode.
But at some point, you can't turn the focus knob any more, and however far from the film the lens is at that point is as far as it's going to get so at that point you're focusing as close as you ever will -- unless, of course, you use extension.
The simplest way to get extension is simply to attach a hollow tube between the camera body and the lens. These exist, and are called "extension tubes". They have mounting hardware on one end that will attach to the camera body and on the other end to hook to your lens. Some of them have linkages or even electronics to transmit information from the lens back to the camera body, depending on the sophistication of the system. But basically what they do is to let you move the lens further from the film and hence, focus on objects closer to the lens.
Often, you can get tubes in different lengths, and you can hook a series of them together to get more and more extension. The longer the tube or total length of the tubes hooked together, the more magnification you will get.
Of course this all doesn't come for free. There is a list of things to consider.
First, most lenses are designed to be optically optimum in a certain range, and the lens manufacturers let you use this entire range using the normal focusing ring. When you put on an extension tube, you are effectively pushing the lens outside its optimal range. The more you push it, the more distortion (of various sorts) you'll get. Note that lenses that are specifically designed as macro lenses are already optimized for close up work, so you'll usually have less troubles using them on the ends of extension tubes or bellows (see below for information on bellows).
Second, as soon as you slap in an extension tube, you lose focus at infinity since you can't bring the lens all the way back. Imagine how terrible you'll feel if you've got some extension on your telephoto because you're shooting a close-up of a hummingbird and then you suddenly notice an Ivory-billed woodpecker 30 meters away. You swing your lens around to get that once-in-a-lifetime shot and find that you can't focus because the bird is too far away. Then, as you desperately are taking the lens off to remove the extension, the bird flies away.
Third, the more extension you use, the harder it gets to focus for two reasons. First, far less light is coming in, and second, with a lot of magnification, the depth of field gets extremely tiny.
Finally, many camera systems lose a lot of their automatic features (such as auto-focus) when you're using extension. You'll have to know how to use what will basically become a manual camera. This does not, however, apply to TTL metering. TTL miraculously takes it all into account.
But even with all the disadvantages listed above, I still think that extension tubes are the best way to go, especially for a beginner at macro photography. First of all, there's no additional glass between the film and the subject -- just a tube full of air. Because of this, they're also relatively cheap, at least compared to some to the options presented below. They can also be used in conjunction with the methods below as well to increase magnification. So in my opinion, if you're interested in messing around with some close-up photography, the best thing you can do is to get one or two extension tubes of different sizes.
Before you start messing with bellows, make sure you've got a heavy, solid tripod to hold everything still, and be ready to spend a lot of time working on each shot, and be prepared to take a lot of really terrible shots.
When you hook a lens to your camera through a good set of extension tubes, the various mechanical and electrical linkages between the lens and the camera body are preserved. (With cheap extension tubes, this may not be the case.) With extension bellows, you're almost certainly going to lose these features.
Here are a couple of the things you lose:
Normally, even when you set your aperture to a small opening to improve depth-of-field or for whatever reason, the diaphragm doesn't close down until you trip the shutter. A mechanical linkage holds the lens wide-open so that a lot more light gets to the viewfinder and/or the auto-focus system. With the lens stopped down, and not much light coming through, it's tough to focus manually, and it's often impossible for an auto-focus system to operate at all. So if you're using bellows, you have to manually open the lens up to do your focusing, and then manually stop it down before you take the shot. This is another reason that a very solid tripod is necessary -- you don't want anything to move after you've got your subject in focus and you're messing with the aperture to get better depth of field.
Similarly, if the electrical connection between the lens and the camera is broken by the extension bellows, the camera doesn't have any idea what sort of lens is sitting on the other end, so full program-mode automatic operation is impossible. About the only thing that'll work (other than a pure manual mode) is aperture-priority mode.
You can purchase a device to help with one of these problems -- it's a cable-release that has two connections on it. As you press the button to trip the shutter, first one of the cables that's connected to the lens pushes the little lever on the lens to close down the aperture, and as soon as that job is done, the second cable causes the camera's shutter to trip. This device can also be useful for reversed lenses; see that section below.
The magnification power of these "filter" lenses is measured in "diopters" which is basically 1/f, where f is the focal length in meters. The advantage of using the diopter measure is that the more diopters, the more magnification you're going to get. Also, you can get a rough idea of the amount of magnification you're going to get when you "stack" together more than one of these lenses (sometimes called "diopter lenses" is to add the diopters of the lenses. In other words, if you stack a 1 and a 2 diopter filter in front of your lens, it's roughly the same as putting on a single 3 diopter filter.
The disadvantage, of course, is that there's more glass between your subject and your film, and if the diopter lenses are of low quality they can cause all the usual problems -- non-linear distortions, loss of light because the coatings aren't perfect, more random photons bouncing around at oddball angles inside your camera because of reflections off the surfaces, et cetera.
Although to a beginner, these filters seem like the easiest way to get higher magnification, I think they're more trouble than they're worth, and I'd vote for simple extension tubes instead. But if you do insist on using them, buy filters whose quality is at least comparable with the quality of the lenses you're planning to use them with.
Just what does it mean to turn a lens around? It simply means that the end of the lens that normally connects to the camera is nearest the subject, and the front of the lens is attached to the camera. To do this, you need a special device that attaches to your camera body like a normal lens mount, and on the other end has a set of threads that screws into the lens the way a filter would normally attach.
The reason this sometimes works to improve magnification is that the optical center of the lens is not necessarily in the physical center. By reversing the lens, you may be (and in fact, usually are) moving the optical center further from the film. As you recall, the standard lens formula tells you that this causes the focus to move closer to the camera, thus increasing the magnification.
Of course with a reversed lens, you have the same problems you did with a bellows -- you've lost the normal mechanical and electrical connections between the lens and the camera body. Read the section above on extension bellows to learn what the problems are, and how you can solve them.
Return to the beginner's guide.
Want to send me mail? Click: ( firstname.lastname@example.org)